Related Articles

1 user responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
tagajawa said in February 9th, 2010 at 9:12 am (tagajawa@yahoo.com)

except for the concern on software being in the wrong hands and the ownership of the source codes, all other concerns existed even during the conduct of manual elections.

what is automated is the counting only and the transmission of results. all others are the same be it manual or automated.

there are plan Bs though in the process. can we not count the ballots manually if the PCOS machine breaks down? can we not bring the ballots securely to another precint where the PCOS is working?

in case the “transmission from precint to comelec” is hacked, which is a difficult possibility, are there no print outs after the count? those counts can be verified versus what’s reported to the central comelec, right? so why the fuss?

or are we just trying to portray a worse case scenario so that we all go back to manual counting and tallying, and then the politicians can do their bags of tricks to change the results!!

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address

 Website (*optional)

Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments